Checked By A Clinician Before You Read It.

Every page on this site that makes a clinical claim is reviewed by a [[GMC or HCPC]]-registered clinician before publication, and re-reviewed on a set cycle afterwards. This page explains what a reviewer actually checks, how often, and what happens when something is wrong.

MEDICAL REVIEW

A Named Reviewer On Every Clinical Page.

Health content without a named reviewer is just marketing. Every clinical page here shows who reviewed it, their [[GMC / HCPC]] registration number linked to the public register, the date it was reviewed, and when it is due for review again — so accountability is visible, not implied.

Review criteria

What a clinical reviewer actually checks.

01

Factual accuracy

Every clinical claim is checked against its primary source. Outdated or unsupported claims are flagged and rewritten before publication.

02

Source authority

Reviewers confirm cited sources meet our standard — NICE, NHS, peer-reviewed literature — rather than secondary or unverified sources.

03

Clinical standards

Content describing assessment, diagnosis or treatment is checked against NICE guidance for adult ADHD (NG87) and autism (CG142), and DSM-5-TR criteria — nothing may describe a process we do not follow.

04

No overstatement

Treatment effectiveness is never overstated, uncertainty is stated where evidence is developing, and no wording implies a guaranteed outcome or diagnosis. Assessments are sold; diagnoses are not.

05

Regulatory compliance

No prescription-only medicine is named in promotional context (Human Medicines Regulations 2012), no superlative or comparative claims we cannot substantiate, and screening tools are never described as diagnostic.

06

Safety and signposting

Crisis signposting is present, exclusions and risks are stated plainly, and nothing on the page could reasonably lead a reader to delay urgent care.

Review cycle

Nothing stays published unchecked indefinitely.

Standard review cadence

Clinical pages are re-reviewed on a scheduled cycle — [[annually, with quarterly review of fast-changing pages: NHS waiting times, Right to Choose and shared care]] — and immediately whenever relevant NICE or NHS guidance changes. The reviewer's name and most recent review date are shown at the bottom of every clinical page.

Reporting an error

If you spot something that looks outdated or incorrect, tell us the page, the specific claim, and — if you have one — a source supporting the correction. We acknowledge reports within [[5 working days]] and complete a medical re-review within [[14 days]].

Still deciding? A two minute check costs nothing.

ADHD Screener ~2 minutes

Could it be ADHD?

This short screener covers the symptom areas clinicians assess — attention, restlessness and impulsivity — to indicate whether a full assessment may be worthwhile. It is a screening tool, not a diagnosis.

Who is this screening for?

Almost done — where should we send your results?

Enter your details to see your results on screen and receive a copy, along with a short guide on what to do next.

This screener is an educational tool and does not provide a medical diagnosis. Only a qualified clinician can diagnose ADHD following a full clinical assessment. A positive screen does not mean you (or your child) have ADHD, and a negative screen does not rule it out. If you are struggling, please speak to your GP or a mental health professional.